By Dr Ghulam Sibtain Masoodi, M.D
Beef Ban is nothing new in Jammu and Kashmir. It started in 1932, when J&K was a slave state of Dogras and they passed a law to Ban the Beef slaughter. Is this law implementation justified by the highest court of the state, when we are told that we are not today the state subjects of Dogra Rule and how did the Judges of this highest Court of the state implemented that law in the state, are these high court judges working for the law of Maharaja Gulab Singh and his dynasty of 1932 law and these judges have been appointed in year 2015 in the state of Jammu and Kashmir, when this law has not been implemented for last 50 years, because this la belongs to theocracy and Dictatorial Maharajas.
In 1947, the ruling Maharaja Hari Singh, the ruler of Kashmir was deported and he took asylum in Bombay and his Son Dr Karan Singh was appointed as the President (NOT Maharaja of the State) and we the people of Greater Kashmir, rejected the statehood of 3 Kilometer of Jammu as state.
The people of the state in 1948 should have changed the name of the state back to the Greater Kashmir from the rule of Ranchan Shah, a Buddhist king to the Mughal empire and then Badshah. But Sheikh Mohammed Abdullah did not discard any laws under slavery of Dogra Shahi, but he considered only laws which were democratic for the state and implemented then and did not need to discard or implement the Dogra slavery laws in his free nation. Let me give an eye opener to this advocate Goshi who went to the High Court and made himself naked. Mr Ghoshi, I understand you are a Hindu worshiping cow, why do you want a non Hindu to worship your Goddess. This is a democracy of India and not your houses theocracy. Do you have knowledge about all the laws of Dogra Shahi about whom you are shedding tears.
Look into the other laws. There was another law passed around in 1932, that no body in the Dogra slave state can produce electricity in the state, except the Maharaja. Mr Ghoshi why did you not look at that law also and made stupid slave high court of this state to re-implement that stupid law about electricity. For your information of your stupidity, if that law is re-implemented in the state today , then every police man will arrest all shopkeepers for generating electricity in the state by grabbing their generators of electricity and these police men will be billionaires in only one hour and we all will be in darkness. I request the Bar association of J&K to bar this advocate Sunil Sethi for living in Dogra rule and getting it re-implemented in state democracy or Indian democracy which are not thank God theocracy states and country.
These venomous Hindus of BJP want J&K state to become Hindu state of India, because BJP banned the beef slaughter in Gujarat, thus Mr Modi who build Gujarat from worst poor state to the current state of prosperity and why did not Mr Modi ban the beef slaughtering in his time period, which he could have easily done, because he was already accused of religious slaughter in the state rightly or wrongly, it is obvious then Gujarat would not be a democratic state, but it was going to be theocratic state and which is constitutionally illegal for democratic India , unless they will rename the Democratic India into Hindu theocratic India and change its constitution and it will not be too long when Hindu Indian cow give another birth not one baby but many babies with different religions.
The decision of the high court judges of the state absolutely is on the basis of their theological inheritance, the reason being: ( 1) The complainers are Hindus and judges are also are non Muslims, so conveniently the verdict was passed by judges of the state against the Muslims, as if these Judges are sitting on the chair of Hindu/ Dogra theocratic state, when the whole state subjects were slaves under order of Maharaja. I t seems that the deciders of this issue are living in 1932 under the rule of Maharaja Harisingh. I want to know from the court and petitioners that, are they living and acting in 2015 or their clock of their brain is imagining Maharaja is Ruler and they are serving the highest court of Maharaja.
(2) Does the court understand in 1932 the state subjects were bought slaves and the ruler ordered the laws which suited his dynasty. Those were not democratic laws, let me give one example:
The Maharaja Hari Singh in 1930 also passed a law, that no one can generate electricity in the state, except the orders of Maharaja. Now why the high court did not say all laws of Dogra shahi should be implemented or the state legislative assembly should implement those Dogra Shahi Laws, or discard them and it is the right of legislative assembly to delete those garbage theocratic and dictatorial dynasty laws or incorporate those laws into the current democratic laws of the nation. When the state in 1947 became independent, we had President like India had, and we had Prime minister as India had, we had a brand new legislative assembly, it was their right to create new laws and the laws which were in Dogra Shahi were not incorporated because those laws did not fit in democratic constitution of Kashmir. I am surprised at the High court judges incorporated discarded laws, because it fit their own religious scheme.
(3) In 1947 India became free and the country had choice to become theocracy or Democracy, but it chose democracy which has nothing to do with religion and BJP changed the state of Gujarat, into theocracy recently by banning the beep slaughter, thus the state has violated the rights of Non Hindus, does that mean tomorrow all non Hindus have to accept the Hinduism or else go to Jail. It is responsibility of Prime minister of India to rename India first as Theocratic country like ‘MahaBarat’ and let the rest of the religious minority decide what should they do or is it time for this sacred cow to give multiple births with religious tones. It is only then any state can implement only Hindu Law.
(4) When India got independence, did they inherit all British laws? No they did not, instead whatever good was there, they used it in the democratic constitution and they left the bad. Thus the decision of bringing garbage law into practice in the state is nothing but the garbage unless the judges change the constitution of the country and the state. If country is democratic, then state cannot be theocratic, it also has to be democratic. It is above time when judges of such thought should be weeded off.
(Opinions expressed in this article are of the author and not of the Kashmir Scenario)